|
|
|
The East Pacific brought to you by, | |||||||||||||
|
Social
Roleplay
|
|
| Welcome to The East Pacific. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you may register an account here! I'm registered. Where do I start? When you sign up on our forums, your account may be limited to certain forums, and unable to make requests in our roleplay section. We recommend that you Apply for Citizenship to gain all the benefits of being part of our roleplay community! |
| Enough with the New, In with the OLD! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 24 2013, 03:28:55 PM (919 Views) | |
| Old Federalia | Oct 24 2013, 03:28:55 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Professor F
|
Dear regionmates, I address you the second time as candidate for Delegate. I think this election is just as critical as the previous, but also just as critical as every delegate election. I fought for the 4 month term amendment because I believed 6 months was too long to wait to give the delegate a review. The incumbent, AMOM, isn't running, so instead, you will have to give the candidates a review. What do we stand for? What are our principles and beliefs? What have we accomplished for TEP? One thing on most people's minds when they think about me as a candidate is my disappearance for 30 days recently. I left with the intention to permanently leave NS and focus on my life. I was failing college classes, among other, more personal issues. I happily report I'm back on track with a new set of priorities. However, I never truly disappeared. I kept my eye on things here, even posting in the Conclave Amendment thread in the Magisterium in order to throw in my two cents from when I was an Arbiter. Besides that, I was also watching the Gameplay forum, and made my opinion known as you know I just have to do. That's really why I'm back, I couldn't stay away from NS. If I am playing NS, I am here. My posts during that month: In TEP: http://theeastpacific.com/single/?p=8011456&t=5177199) In the Gameplay forum: http://forum.nationstates.net/search.php?author_id=69462&sr=posts Pay attention to this post: http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=265792&p=16973219&sid=71705ae7ea0e08931234f8dfb1d4eaac#p16973219 I hope that helps everyone understand what happened. I really didn't want to resign as Arbiter. I had arranged for Viceroy elections and really felt the Conclave was able to start making progress again. Of all the places to have an opinion, the Conclave is the place to be. ![]() I also resigned from the Citizenship Commission. Juris created the Commission and put me in charge of it. I'm very proud to have had his confidence and the chance to end TEP's age old struggle with registering new citizens. So here I am again, for the second time, asking for your vote. I think I'm the best candidate, but I'm biased I hope you ask yourself, of all the questions you're going to ask, "What does TEP need right now?"I think TEP needs a destination and a leader to guide us there. For as I long as I have been in TEP, we've had a problem with active leadership because life got in their way. I can't criticize that, I resigned as Arbiter. What I can say, though, is I'm confident that the month I spent focusing on my personal life has, if anything has, prepared me for the delegacy. I have enough time during the next four months to focus on TEP's needs. Well, what are TEP's needs? I'm going to stick myself out there and say I'm the only candidate so far to truly understand TEP's needs. I know because I have experience in TEP just like they do--AND experience from outside TEP. I've already dealt with the problems we are facing through my previous region, Atrigeas. Let me tell you about Atrigeas. I joined NS in February 2012, and joined the Featured Region that day. It was new, only a few days old. There were a few people, and we decided to start an RP government on the RMB. That proved difficult, so I started a forum and learned that OOC does not mix with IC. Then I wrote two "acts" that formed the constitution of our "Parliament." I was the first speaker, then was elected the WA Delegate--but soon learned things weren't as easy as they appeared. The government stalled, so we created a new government. We used a draft I wrote to form a three-branch system much like TEP. During that time, we joined the Founderless Regions Alliance and the NationStates Republic. We also grew to over 100, twice. After a while, I contacted people from the Founderless Regions Alliance to form a joint-forum confederation. After some convincing, Atlantis and New Sorvun joined Atrigeas to form the Commonwealth of Regions. I also sought election as president of the NS Republic. The NSR was a collection of regions who were loosely aligned in the hope that cooperation would benefit us all. Some were defender, some were raider, while others were RP , and one was even a region of anime enthusiasts. Needless to say, things were disorganized. The West Pacific started the NS Republic in hope it could build a network of regions under its leadership, but they lost interest and made a separate forum for the NSR, since the NSR was using their forum. I ended up volunteering to inform the member regions about the new forum. This made the then-president, Enlightened Defenders, trust my sincerity. When it was time to vote, his endorsement sealed my fate as NSR President. What did I get myself into? I soon resigned from the delegacy of Atrigeas to focus on the NSR. This made my vice-delegate the delegate. While this was all happening, I was still stuck drafting the charter of the Commonwealth. After 8 months, New Sorvun and Atlantis decided to cut Atrigeas out of it, and the Commonwealth was born without its founder. However, I kept my eye on things, and when their plan for deciding the admins of the joint-forum wasn't working, I secretly drafted an amendment, and that amendment quickly passed and the situation was resolved. If you know me, you know I loved rubbing it in their faces that I was RIGHT ALL ALONG! Anyways, while president of the NSR, I was had to organize an alliance of an unknown number of regions! Seriously, there wasn't even an accurate list of member regions. I created a list, and visited them. There were all types of regions! From TWP with 4,000 nations, to a tiny region with just a few nations! I started by organizing the forum. Later, I changed the forum back, because I was WRONG about forum organization. I also telegrammed the founders and delegates of each region. To my surprise, most were unaware of their membership in the NSR. Regardless, they came. Even more surprising, they gave me an embassy in their forums. I used those embassies to post biweekly updates. These updates were exaggerated, but it got people asking questions and traffic to the alliance forum skyrocketed. Soon, I was able to organize a Constitutional Convention and assembled a Cabinet. You know the saying, "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer?" I followed that advice when I made my Cabinet. I put the interests of the alliance first. I made my opponent in the presidential election my World Assembly Minister, and someone from a region who wanted to leave the NSR the Defense Minister. The WA Minister lost interest, but the Defense Minister's region got involved! Even more peculiar was my vice president, I promoted the founder of the NSR, and thus the biggest threat to my potential re-election. When re-election came four months later, I won against my vice president by a rock slide. We had different proposals going, and a new Constitution was christened. More impressively, I got the militaries of a few of our regions to work together to take Warzone Africa! I was delegate of WZ Africa for 90 days! We tried other things, but this was the NSR's biggest success, a coalition. So, when considering who should be TEP's delegate, I hope you consider me. I made TEP my home, and worked to make it better. An added bonus is my experience with Atrigeas, the Commonwealth, and the NS Republic. What I would want to happen if I were elected: Plan Here is a series of questions that should be being asked, but aren't. --So how many foreign updates have you written? Dozens, I've lost count. I've tried all sorts of things to get other regions' attention. Some things were awards, a few of which were given to foreign ambassadors. Another thing was a table of contents in order to point out the most exciting things in the update. Links help get people to check one's forum. --How many regions' forums have you visited? A hundred, at least. Most are small and don't last. My favorite was 10,000 Islands', because it is the largest region but has an outdated forum that people still enjoy. --How many regions were you been an ambassador to? Over 40. I've gotten into arguments, but I've also made allies--in the same region sometimes! --How well have you gotten to know the WA GA and SC forums on the site? I wrote a proposal to repeal Security Council Resolution #109, Liberate Nazi Germany, but didn't submit it because not enough people thought it was better than the other Repeal SC#109s. The WA has a lot of rules for submitting a proposal. I have a lot of respect for people who write proposals. Some rules prevent resolutions from mentioning each other in order to prevent a "house of cards" where if one resolution was repealed, none of the other would make sense. Jokes proposals are the best though. It's always funny to see someone make fun of the game or a famous NSer. --Do you know the names of any of the well-known writers? Sure, Aurelia, Glen-Rhodes, Ossistania, Skydip, and our very own AMOM and Unibot. That's honestly off the top of my head. There are others I'd remember if I saw their name on a proposal that has been submitted or telegrammed to me. --What standards would you have for a WA resolution? For SC resolutions, I look to see if that person or region deserves a commendation or condemnation, or if their region is in fact invaded if the submitted resolution is a liberation. For the GA, I'm not impressed by half the proposals. I like proposals that are actually needed. Resolutions to protect the cultural heritage of underwater basket weaving don't deserve to reach quorum. --How many people have you recruited to a region? Oh, about 150 to 200. I like recruitment telegrams that list what the region has to offer. I'd use TEP's welcome telegram to offer new nations help. I'd make it seem like I'm their NPC guide into the world of NS. Of course, everything NS has to offer is also right here in TEP ![]() Have you ever written a recruitment or welcome telegram? Yep. Tons, experimented with all sorts of stuff. People like buzz words--instead of saying "roleplaying," say "war" and "trade." Greeting them In-Character is usually just confusing for them. --Have you ever organized anything on an RMB? Yep! I organized a government, tons of votes, and plenty of games. Games that work best are considered "spam" games because players can enter a word or two, so it's quick. Long answers will end up confusing the order because people will post replies to the same post. --How many inter-regional treaties or charters have you written? Well, I have helped amend the Founderless Regions Alliance charter, re-wrote the NSR's constitution to better suit the "loose" alliance we had become, and I organized the Commonwealth, so its charter is nearly what I imagined it would be, with its separation of powers and checks-and-balances. Most interregional organization stuff, not actual treaties. --What problems is TEP facing? TEP is facing the problem of limited function. During AMOM's delegacy, the Magisterium got things going again with amendments to the EPSA, University, and the creation of the EPPS. It also confirmed Todd, EM, me, and then Hobbes as arbiters. Juris also created the Citizenship Commission, and registration hasn't been faster since I joined TEP. However, all these things are more or less standing alone. Granted, the EPSA and EPPS are intended to work together, but TEP's government hasn't had the leader it needs because AMOM was, understandably, busy. --How do you plan on solving them? I would fix "limited function" by encouraging the Magisterium to add clarity to the Concordat, and by encouraging the Conclave to fix their SO, which they are doing. I would also proposal a better legal system where some "crimes" are summary offenses while other are indictable. I'd also want a better system for the EPPS to get warrants for investigating citizens. More importantly, I plan on teaching people how to do their jobs in the executive. The four ministries I'd create will be given tasks that don't overlap. They will not be given useless tasks nor be left to think of their own agenda. If TEP is going to be more functional, the region has to work together. If the region is going to work together, the executive has to work together. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 26 2013, 02:58:42 PM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Nalt | Oct 24 2013, 03:32:26 PM Post #2 |
|
DO NOT WANT!!!!!!
|
If you are not elected do you plan to disappear until the next election? |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 24 2013, 03:37:04 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Professor F
|
Are you saying I disappeared after the last one? I did not. I made TEP my home. I became an arbiter. Then I had to take care of RL. I resigned. But I never disappeared! There are posts on this forum and in the Gameplay forum that show I was lurking. I came back because I took care of real life and wanted to play. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Nalt | Oct 24 2013, 03:39:26 PM Post #4 |
|
DO NOT WANT!!!!!!
|
Well I am certainly glad everything cleared up last week, that was great timing. I will at least say I enjoy the tag line "Out with the new, in with the OLD. Clever. I do agree with much of what Hobbes said in Skype, that the forum masking is more of an admin thing, the SO of the Conclave is not really up to you, and nor is what the Magisterium does either. Good luck, nonetheless. |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 24 2013, 03:47:46 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Professor F
|
Well, nominations weren't supposed to happen until next week, so this is a surprise to me, how could I have planned that? I mean seriously, I quit all of NS, I would have just left the region if I only wanted to be delegate, not NS. It's really unfair that you can't respect my RL as personal. I got the tag line after watching the trailer of Captain America: Winter Soldier. He makes old fashioned look cool! I was referring to everything in story form. Just trying to give TEP what it is really lacking: direction. The only thing I'm planning on is cooperation. I hope everyone will be able to agree we need a starting line. That's my plan, make a starting line. If I get elected, then I hope enough people will agree with me to fulfill this plan. If they don't vote for me, then the plan definitely won't happen. Also note, just before TEP reopens, I said all three elected officers would give an interview to discuss what each of them accomplished. I hope you see that I plan on all three of us cooperating to make TEP a better place. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 24 2013, 03:56:57 PM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| unibot | Oct 24 2013, 04:00:25 PM Post #6 |
|
Never Cruel or Cowardly
|
Got to admit, that tag-line is badass.
Sorry, what "Lockdown"? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 24 2013, 04:03:08 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Professor F
|
Oops, sorry. I said shutdown, then referred to it as a lockdown. I can't pick one! Um...shutdown. Lockdown sounds like we're locking people out. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 24 2013, 05:52:01 PM Post #8 |
![]()
NES w/8-track expansion
|
OF, couping the region? Idk if you have my vote right now, it's split between you and Prussia. |
![]() |
|
| A Slanted Black Stripe | Oct 24 2013, 10:43:49 PM Post #9 |
|
What stripe?
|
First, I want to thank you for the kind words in your nomination for me. I had made it clear, many times, that being delegate is not for me, but your nomination, nonetheless, was very kind. I think people have fairly asked about your commitment to this region. It may be a RL issue, but the impact is the same. You resigned from the Conclave when we desperately needed to get the Conclave more active and functional. While it may have nothing to do with reality and it may be unfair, the appearance is that you are someone who becomes very active when delegate elections are afoot. How can you convince us that you are in this for the full four months of the delegate term? On the lighter side, Red Sox or Cardinals? |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 24 2013, 11:20:28 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Professor F
|
I didn't leave the Conclave hanging. Thanks to me, we elected a viceroy. Ask the arbiters if I'm telling the truth. My commitment? I resigned from all of NS. If you look on the Atrigeas RMB, you can see I said "I quit NS." I then proceeded to help Atrigeas select a new delegate, since the old one didn't seek reelection. I also quit TWP, where I was trying to build trust and get a treaty signed. I made them laugh by calling the Landsharrd the "Landshark." However, I didn't just quit. I was watching NS, and I was watching TEP. I didn't always post something, but I was watching. After I resigned, I posted once, (http://theeastpacific.com/single/?p=8011456&t=5177199), and sent a telegram to Todd. I then proceeded to keep watching. On Oct. 14th, I posted four times in the Gameplay forum, which I was also watching. http://forum.nationstates.net/search.php?author_id=69462&sr=posts Pay attention to this post: http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=265792&p=16973219&sid=71705ae7ea0e08931234f8dfb1d4eaac#p16973219 So, I didn't leave! I was always here! RL needed attention, I was paying way too much attention to NS. I got things together, and asked myself if I wanted to come back. I knew I was going to keep checking up on NS, so I came back completely. Does this satisfy the claim I only show up when I want to be delegate? Does anyone remember the stuff I did after I lost the election to AMOM? Remember that amendment I fought for, or all the arguments I had about anything and everything? Everyone's claims that I just want to be elected are childish and unfair. You aren't paying attention to what really matters. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| unibot | Oct 25 2013, 05:59:06 PM Post #11 |
|
Never Cruel or Cowardly
|
How would you describe you, philosophically (ideologically etc.) in NS? What do you believe in.. in regards to the relations between regions (are their interregional rules?) and the relations to the individual and the region (individualism v. communitarianism) etc. etc. etc. I want to know more about you as a thinker. Thanks. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 25 2013, 06:38:21 PM Post #12 |
![]()
Professor F
|
Relations between regions: I think NS is no different than human relationships everywhere. It is a great political simulation. Therefore, all the things we see happening in NS are the result of human nature, for better or worse. I am a Second Foundationer. Know Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series? Well, the book was written with the assumption history repeats itself, and the future is chartered by predictable mob reactions, which are simply generalized human reactions on a much, much larger scale. I believe the future of NS involves the disintegration of bipolarity. For example, there is an over-hyped "conflict of interests" between francoism and imperialism. Neither can win. The feeders and sinkers have a lot of influence because of their size, their number of endorsements, and centralized role in foreign affairs (this is arguable, but my opinion). However, only one person can be in control of each feeder, so that person decides the fate of their GCR. Are any GCR delegates only responsible for WA affairs? No. So when someone becomes delegate, they want to keep the control they are given, and end up developing an understanding for the francoist perspective that UCRs are leaches. Whether or not they act on it, they understand its' merits. On the other hand, at least 90% of players in feeders started in UCRs. That is their starting perspective, so they will always understand the perspective the feeders and sinkers are tools. These perspectives are just as much a conflict of the mind as they are in politics. UCRs and GCRs are breeding grounds for both "ideologies," but neither are ever going away. So, neither can win. People will realize it's pointless to pick a side, just as they are starting to accept it's useless to pick a side in R/D, a much more defined and fortified conflict. My conclusion is this: divisions are temporary, and NS is cycle through periods of anarchic creativity and constructive order. We are entering an age of anarchy as the divisions continue disintegrate. Soon, there will be a new order. Relations between regions and individuals: I think this is just like the relations between regions, just much less predictable and way more chaotic. The key to accepting the region-individual relationship is accepting it comes down to friendship. Friends stick together, and their bonds are stronger than their bonds to their regions. Some regions are made of people mostly from just that region, while other regions are made up people from multiple regions, and most of those people know each other from somewhere else. It's just a question of whether one chooses to play at an inter- or intra-regional level. For example, people will make decisions as to whom to vote for in this election based on friendship. That is unavoidable. If your friend was running for president of the United States, you'd no doubt vote for them just so you can visit the White House. Likewise, this election comes down to who makes the most promises. People are already handing out positions. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 25 2013, 06:39:16 PM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| A Slanted Black Stripe | Oct 25 2013, 10:44:21 PM Post #13 |
|
What stripe?
|
Let's talk about some practical stuff -- the WFE and RMB. Currently, ours is stale. What will you do differently if you become Delegate? Lots of nations in the region engage only at this level. What will you do to make the WFE and RMB fun and interesting?
Edited by A Slanted Black Stripe, Oct 25 2013, 10:45:32 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 25 2013, 11:08:52 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Professor F
|
hehe...do I get any credit for already knowing those are critical to being delegate?
And:
The WFE entry would be used to create a big mystery. People would want to find out what was happening and join the forum. Other things would be on the WFE, like the link to the forum, and instructions for the RMB, where the Tourism Minister would be doing games in order to get people interested in getting more involved. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 26 2013, 12:31:17 AM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 26 2013, 12:42:03 AM Post #15 |
![]()
Professor F
|
I've updated my platform. My plan is the same, I didn't change it, but I'm focusing on the person I am as well as my plan.
Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 26 2013, 12:42:55 AM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| A Slanted Black Stripe | Oct 26 2013, 07:25:25 PM Post #16 |
|
What stripe?
|
Some questions and reactions to what you have posted.
The Magisterium, as you stated in another message, is working quite well right now. And we do this, with the overlay of the coming and going of nations from TEP. Shutting down the input flow to the Magisterium will weaken the Magisterium and make it difficult to achieve your stated goal for the Magisterium -- amending and rewriting the Concordat. I disagree with this proposal. Further, in your proposal, you make a lot of assumptions about the Magisters willingness to follow your plan for removing Arbiters. You may be elected by citizens other than the Magisterium. You may not be satisfied with the rate of change taking place in the judicial system, but both the Conclave and the Magisterium have been working through various ideas for an improved judicial system. You have submitted some ideas and they have been included in the discussion. I don't agree with this approach to a government shutdown or lockdown.
This would have read better if you had said, "As the work is completed and TEP re-opens, I'll invite the Viceroy and Provost to join me for a press conference to describe what the world can now expect from TEP." Your message is brash and demanding, and somewhat disrespectful of the people you are ordering around.
Why is this a question that should have been asked? What does this prove? Here's a better question: Since you picked these writers (Aurelia, Glen-Rhodes, Ossistania, Skydip, and our very own AMOM and Unibot -- you kind of slammed Todd by leaving him off the list), name their major works, contrast and compare their assumptions and conclusions, and let us know how this would inform your work as Delegate?
You keep dismissing this concern as not valid. Your counterargument is that you are fine now and posted a few times during your absence, so you weren't really gone. All this may be true, but it is still valid for people to be concerned. It's easier to be comfortable with a candidate who has had a continuous and very active presence for the months leading up to the election. Even with that, things happen. AMOM was active for months before his election, but something changed and while he has done the Delegate's job, he has not been as active as he was before he became Delegate. So, lighten up on the outrage when people ask the question. We have concerns. While there may be nothing you can do to reassure us, we, the voters, are trying to evaluate all the risks with the candidates, looking for the person who gives us ideas we like and we feel can be present to support and keep the region active. |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 26 2013, 08:05:29 PM Post #17 |
![]()
Professor F
|
I didn't make assumptions. I stated my plan. If people don't like it, they dont have to vote for me. That's the difference between me and the rest of TEP. I see a void of true leadership. ASBS, you've been the only source of leadership, and continually strive to keep procedure in line with the Concordat. By stating my plan in third person, I attempted to show the voters that things can change. We as a region can start working together! No one is ever going to agree, but we must put aside our disagreements and move forward. Current citizens would not be prevented from joining the Magisterium. If we are going to make the Concordat better, it has to be done so by those who are here and already understand that our system doesn't need to be changed. New citizens would want to change things. When the Magisterium passes any potential amendments, THEN the new citizens can partake in the discussion when it goes to referendum. My whole goal as delegate would be to align the goals of the three branches (and the admin staff) in order to benefit TEP. Right now, things are chaotic and each "interest" counteracts the other interests, thereby nullifying any progress towards a TEP that is master of the world. Any of the other candidates would do a good job as delegate, but as I said, you took the Magisterium to the next level. I want to take the whole region to the next level! Vote for me for the fulfillment of our potential, rather than just a well-organized executive. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 26 2013, 08:31:12 PM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 26 2013, 09:08:57 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Professor F
|
You wanted this question answered as well:
I cannot, that would be a waste of time. For the next delegate, it does not matter if he knows the differences between these writers. It matters that the next delegate knows that when they telegram him, he should listen. The next delegate also needs to know how to make use of the WA, instead of merely approving and voting for proposals. Having a WA department for the sake of having a WA department is also a waste of time. There has to be a greater purpose for devoting resources to the WA. My conclusion is that TEP's tremendous influence in the WA because of its size should be used for TEP's benefit. Further, because we are not the only GCR with hundreds of endorsements, the other delegates could possibly want to wield their influence in the WA for their own benefit as well. This is key to Pan-Pacifica, not mutual defense. So, I'm not just a candidate that supports feeder and sinker unity, I have a specific path towards that goal. PS: I did not slam Todd, I only forgot he wrote resolutions as well. He's forever stuck in my mind as TEP's former delegate. Edited by Old Federalia, Oct 26 2013, 09:09:55 PM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| A Slanted Black Stripe | Oct 26 2013, 11:09:52 PM Post #19 |
|
What stripe?
|
I didn't realize you were speaking only of issues and resolution writers. I thought you were referring to documents that could be read in the great library of The University of The East Pacific. I think knowing the names of those authors is trivial. Why would anyone ask to list those names? |
![]() |
|
| Old Federalia | Oct 27 2013, 01:28:56 PM Post #20 |
![]()
Professor F
|
I am withdrawing. I really, really, really want to be delegate, but I have more to learn first. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2013, 02:49:08 PM Post #21 |
![]()
The Candy Man
|
under current system the viceroy must approve all epps investigations how would that be different under your proposed warrant system? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." |
|
| « Previous Topic · Past Elections · Next Topic » |




I hope you ask yourself, of all the questions you're going to ask, "What does TEP need right now?"





7:22 PM Jul 10