|
|
|
The East Pacific brought to you by, | |||||||||||||
|
Social
Roleplay
|
|
| Welcome to The East Pacific. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you may register an account here! I'm registered. Where do I start? When you sign up on our forums, your account may be limited to certain forums, and unable to make requests in our roleplay section. We recommend that you Apply for Citizenship to gain all the benefits of being part of our roleplay community! |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Ambassador's Mask Resolution | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 27 2010, 01:17:40 PM (1,360 Views) | |
| Free Pacific States | Nov 27 2010, 01:17:40 PM Post #1 |
|
Number One Drone
|
Alright. So, EM, why don't you sum up the current dilemma regarding Ambassador's Masks, so that the Magisterium can discuss it? I can then draft up a resolution based on what we decide is best as a group. |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| East Malaysia | Nov 28 2010, 11:07:13 PM Post #2 |
|
Laugh hard. Run fast. Be kind.
|
It all started with this. The ambassador mask itself is on the administrative side for implementation, yes, but ambassadors themselves are on the government side. As I volunteer time to the FA here in TEP I could create the criteria myself but I would like it to be not developed by myself. What should be the criteria to get an ambassador mask? Should the group be called Ambassador or Foreign Dignitary? What would be a fitting color to accompany it? Because not everyone fits into it and we have a honored guest mask for the purpose. And ambassadors that are citizens shouldn't have an ambassador mask since they would get the citizen mask. Personally I just feel it is a murky subject even though it is true that I could just do it without anyones permission. But I feel that we, as a group. can formulate a answer to those three questions if not come up with other stuff to go along with it. |
|
Question with Boldness >Sovereign Empire of East Malaysia [url]East Malaysia @ NSWiki[/url] - WIP The Eastrovia Times wwt.et.em Embassy - Coming Soon Character List - Updating Soon >Forum Support ![]() >>>Forum Descriptions Rework<<< >>>Tapatalk Migration Information<<< #forum-help-center \ Mod/admin requests \ Board Rules \ Internet Safety & You \ ZB TOS & TOU Emergency Contact: east.malaysia@mail.theeastpacific.com (forwards directly to my personal email)
| |
![]() |
|
| Todd McCloud | Nov 28 2010, 11:17:40 PM Post #3 |
|
Planet Telox
|
I personally would like to see one of the following: - An "Ambassador" Mask (though Foreign Dignitary sounds good in its own right). Since we're running out of colors pretty fast (we already have white, black, orange, purple, blue, red, green (twice)...). So, I propose it be made yellow. In addition, a separate mask be made for ambassadors who are citizens. Something like "Naturalized Ambassadors" or something to that nature. Make this one either the same color (yellow) or a darker shade of yellow. - The same as part one, but no "Naturalized Ambassador" Mask. Instead, simply group the citizen ambassadors in the citizen mask, using it as a blanket over them. Giving it a bit of thought over the holiday weekend, I feel this option may be more easier to maintain and follow. What I don't agree with is having all ambassadors, regardless of citizenship, blanketed over one term. For me, citizen > ambassador as far as masks are concerned. That doesn't mean one group is better than the other; it simply means that I believe the citizenship designation should hold more weight. Plus it has the potential to make the job of the viceroy more difficult in addition to making citizen ambassadors feel a little left out... to a point. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 29 2010, 10:55:04 AM Post #4 |
|
Deleted User
|
Why does it need a color? A trivial point, but if Citizen > Ambassador, then black is perfectly good for the mask. Give the mask the same privileges as the citizen mask, with the exception of access to say Conclave and Magisterium, and drop it beneath Citizen in the usergroup hierarchy. Should the ambassador want citizenship, then bump him to citizen. No need for a big debate, imho. |
|
|
| SCKnightVulshain | Nov 29 2010, 10:49:43 PM Post #5 |
|
The Boll Weevel
|
I'm with Todd on this one. He makes a lot of good points. Having one group being more important than another goes against everything TEP stands for. |
| Confederacy of Vulshain | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 5 2010, 01:12:39 AM Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
Where are we at with this resolution? Sounds like we are close to a consensus in regards to an Ambassador mask one userlevel below citizen with naturalized ambassadors upgraded to the citizen mask. I'd like to reiterate that I see no reason to give the ambassador mask any color besides the default black. |
|
|
| Nalt | Dec 5 2010, 04:46:04 AM Post #7 |
|
DO NOT WANT!!!!!!
|
Why do we need to recognize a 'naturalized ambassador' as anything other than a citizen? (Or am I misunderstanding that term?) |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 5 2010, 12:09:26 PM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
My understanding is a naturalized ambassador would become a citizen with the appropriate mask. |
|
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 5 2010, 02:38:42 PM Post #9 |
|
Number One Drone
|
I've got to agree with Todd's proposal including the use of the color yellow. While BGP is right that it is unnecessary and that foreign dignitaries hold less privilege than citizens, we've got the color available, so why not make use of it? It'll make them foreign dignitaries stand out and feel special and, hey, everyone can use a bit of that. And, with that in mind, I put forth the following resolution:
|
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 5 2010, 03:33:35 PM Post #10 |
|
Deleted User
|
Move to vote on the resolution as proposed by FPS in the above post. |
|
|
| Todd McCloud | Dec 5 2010, 05:42:10 PM Post #11 |
|
Planet Telox
|
I don't really like the last bit. The viceroy would then have to check the foreign dignitary mask section with each voting period. This would make their job a little harder. I'd just let them remain citizens. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 5 2010, 08:40:23 PM Post #12 |
|
Number One Drone
|
How so? I put that they merely be put as a citizen except if they request to be put as a foreign dignitary. That way, someone can go by their foreign title foremost if they want, but otherwise are just a citizen. |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Nalt | Dec 5 2010, 09:34:18 PM Post #13 |
|
DO NOT WANT!!!!!!
|
I have no idea how Barb makes the citizen list, but if he does use the citizen mask I can see how taking some from that group and putting them in the foreign mask would make it harder since he'd have to look in two places for citizens. Again, I don't actually know if that is how the list is maintained though. |
![]() |
|
| Todd McCloud | Dec 5 2010, 09:50:53 PM Post #14 |
|
Planet Telox
|
Barb's a she XD. I will inform her via PM that her presence is wanted in this thread with regards to the citizenship explanation. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 6 2010, 01:05:29 AM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
If a foreign dignitary becomes a citizen, and gains the citizen mask, how would this make it more difficult to create a citizen list? |
|
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 6 2010, 01:27:27 AM Post #16 |
|
Number One Drone
|
I still don't see the problem. Todd, you yourself proposed that naturalized foreign dignitaries be given the citizens mask. That provision just provides for that -- except if the person requests otherwise. |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Barb | Dec 6 2010, 02:07:45 PM Post #17 |
|
Sergeant Hobo 678
|
Please read "Citizenship FAQ" in Conclave. Concordat states Viceroy is responsible for naturalization and ratifying Concordat is the only path. Nations who are citizens that leave the region are expatriots and lose eligibility to serve in government. Per Magisterium law, citizens whose nations CTE have citizenship suspended. Viceroy Kandarin worked with Admin to develop a historical designation for nations who CTE'd a long time ago - to preserve their contributions to the region. Masking Ambassadors is a fine idea. Creating two masks - one for citizens and one for non-citizens - seems overly complicated. If a nation is on the Citizenship List, they're a citizen. Expats are listed separately but don't have different masks. As for granting forum permissions, Viceroy has no role: that's a security matter and Admin task. TEP government has a cordial relationship but separate authority. Granting the same permissions as citizens to Ambassadors by default diminishes citizenship. They have option to do what I did as Ulthar's Ambassador: ratify Concordat. That implies a social contract - rights are granted in return for taking on the responsibilities of conducting you affairs according to our law. |
|
Barb Arbiter Barbara Manatee Ulthar Ambassador to The East Pacific Convicted Thief of the Crown of the Vizier Keep TEP beautiful! The practice of peace and reconciliation is one of the most vital and artistic of human actions. - Thich Nhat Hanh
| |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 6 2010, 03:44:46 PM Post #18 |
|
Number One Drone
|
I'm sorry, but, I'm still not following. EM requested the Magisterium advise the forum administration about permission masks for foreign dignitaries; you suggested a separate mask colored yellow for foreign dignitaries with naturalized foreigners just given the citizens mask; that provision provides exactly for that except if a person specifically requests the foreign dignitary mask despite citizenship. What's the issue? |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 6 2010, 03:45:36 PM Post #19 |
|
Number One Drone
|
Wait...are we talking about permission masks or user groups? |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Allegheny | Dec 6 2010, 04:06:22 PM Post #20 |
|
Partly Cloudy
|
I am pretty sure masks and user groups are the same thing. the mask being what the user can do on the forums feature wise and the group being what the mask is part of.. like I have a delegate Mask you have a Provost mask, they are the same as citizen masks but with more abilities and responsibilities that came with them. If you wanted th create a mask/group I would say just make it a limited version of the citizen mask IE can edit their own threads and posts but cant vote in polls and government elections... This all coming from my limited self learned time as an admin of a UCR forum, i don't claim professional knowledge. |
![]() There was a hole here. It's gone now. | |
![]() |
|
| Todd McCloud | Dec 6 2010, 04:15:41 PM Post #21 |
|
Planet Telox
|
The issue was whether or not foreign dignitaries that are citizens should be masked as citizens and therefore completely separate from non-citizen foreign dignitaries, simply for the sake of clarification. Since this does not seem to be the case, those who fall into the category of FD and citizens shouldn't have a problem with choosing. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 6 2010, 05:12:13 PM Post #22 |
|
Number One Drone
|
Right...that's what I thought. Do I need to rephrase it, perhaps? |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 7 2010, 12:49:38 AM Post #23 |
|
Deleted User
|
The resolution as I understand it: 1. Ambassadors/Foreign Dignitaries will be given a usergroup/mask titled Foreign Dignitary and will be given access to all public areas. 2. Should an Ambassador/Foreign Dignitary want citizenship, they can ratify the Concordat and upgrade to the Citizen usergroup/mask unless they specifically choose not to. Am I wrong? All the confusion is confusing me. |
|
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 7 2010, 10:26:09 AM Post #24 |
|
Number One Drone
|
That's what I intended. |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 9 2010, 02:22:10 PM Post #25 |
|
Number One Drone
|
So, uh...any more thoughts on the proposal? |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Todd McCloud | Dec 9 2010, 03:15:36 PM Post #26 |
|
Planet Telox
|
Other than it being a little WA-resolution-like (which is more of a preference of style and not a problem with the resolution), I don't see a problem with it. Nice job. Only things I'd recommend, which are small things, is removing "NOW" in the fourth point, and changing "access" to "permissions", like the ability to edit their posts, for instance. Again, small things. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 9 2010, 04:23:42 PM Post #27 |
|
Number One Drone
|
Yeah, it is very WA like -- I used Kelssek's style, which is the same. How does this look?
|
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 9 2010, 07:39:10 PM Post #28 |
|
Deleted User
|
Just a style preference here...
Otherwise, I like it! |
|
|
| Free Pacific States | Dec 10 2010, 12:05:06 AM Post #29 |
|
Number One Drone
|
Edited. Keep it coming. |
| The Federated Alliance of Free Pacific States | Lyon Republic | Republic of Xiopothos | East Pacific Treaty Organization | |
![]() |
|
| Todd McCloud | Dec 15 2010, 05:35:52 PM Post #30 |
|
Planet Telox
|
Anything else? We've not had a comment for this in about six days or so. |
|
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it." "You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi "The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II Vekaiyu's Wiki Page | Ikrisia Levinile's Wiki Page | Listonia's Wiki Page | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Archive: Magisterium · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






7:45 PM Jul 10