— Begin quote from ____
1… How/where do they ratify the Concordat, naturally voter registration, and verify their nations?
2… I’d be interested in a separate thread for the potential new way to hold trials.
3… So for spammers and stuff, we will be changing the RMBRA so that punishment can be appealed by anyone but no trials for anyone? I like that. Or am I misinterpreting it again?
4… Would we have a thing where people lose their voting status if they’re designated WA nation resigns? How would that work? Would there be a system for notification.
Apart from those four points, which are very little compared to my rants in FNR, I am emphatically in support of this new system. It is a step up for security and for the system in general. And aside from that…
IT MAKES EURI A CITIZEN HAHAHAHAH
— End quote
Let me start with if they do not signup for the forum. They don’t need to do anything special. Our region. Our laws. If you are in our region you still need to follow the laws.
But if they are looking to signup because they want to do government, vote or forum rp (this one will not need a voter registration but simply a forum account) then we would have a thread that is near identical to our current citizenship thread.
The biggest difference is a formal ratification or even an oath of loyalty to uphold the Concordat, it doubles as a government application, but outside of that? It’s virtually the same. Verification will be the same process as it currently is. You need to send a TG from that nation (or nations if you’re WA is outside TEP)
That is something that can be a branched off discussion? You don’t need my permission. ;p
But I have seen one idea about for non-forum citizens to have a trial in a separate region/dispatch system. I mean where the trial happens doesn’t exactly matter. The Conclave is still government and forum-based first and foremost. So they would still do their Closed Chambers just as they always have.
A 100% spammer should be dealt with as we currently do. Banject. Banject. Banject. No one in their right mind should think otherwise.
A suggestion was that we could not have automatic trials but to have an appeal process first. I would totally entertain the idea. But if someone really breaks the rules. But a trial might be fun. As with anything it’s open to suggestion.
Absolutely. We currently do it. We will continue to do it. We call it a Citizenship Audit now. In the future it could possible be called a Voter Registration Audit. It’s just like question #1. Virtually exactly the same as the current process.
Some of these changes will simply assume, name change, and slightly modify the current system. That’s what happens with major reforms that in certain cases will simply be absorbing the current.
Euri shall be assimilated.