Rhodesia Intervenes in Oynenyuan Civil War Amidst Ethnic CleansingDUVALL – The Rhodesian military carried out air strikes in Oynenyua today in preparation for a full-scale intervention in the Oynenyuan Civil War after evidence emerged of ethnic cleansing in the anarchic Gondwanan nation.
The Rhodesian Air Force carried out a series of air strikes against the Oynenyuan Tribal Alliance today. The Rhodesians sought to strike the few noticeable command, logistics, and supply centers of the OTA, a coalition of tribes that inhabit the sparsely populated Central-Eastern portion of Oynenyua. The Rhodesians reportedly achieved success without losses, likely in part thanks to assistance provided by air units of the National Army for a Free Oynenyua. The NAFO, a Rhodesian-backed militant group, made public an alleged campaign by OTA forces to forcibly expel Felinds from OTA territory. The NAFO provided significant evidence to back these claims including witness testimony, images of mass graves, and testimony from surrendered OTA fighters.
Rhodesian President Marion Heleck pledged to end those atrocities today, announcing the deployment of Rhodesian marines to kickoff a comprehensive peacekeeping effort in Oynenyua. Heleck made it clear in his speech that Rhodesia planned to fully back the NAFO, and he strongly indicated that he planned to commit Rhodesian forces to defeating the other major Oynenyuan factions. “We act to protect thousands of innocent people in the Oynenyuan region from a mounting military offensive,” he said, “we act to prevent ethnic cleansing and instability. We act to stand united with our ally for peace. By acting now, we are upholding our values, protecting our interests, and advancing the cause of peace.”
The leaders of the OTA denied the charges of ethnic cleansing, however, arguing that the NAFO had manufactured evidence to promote its political goals. “The Alliance absolutely denies that it has engaged in any organized campaign against the Felind peoples,” OTA chairwoman Leyla Guleed told the Maxtopian Times Herald, yesterday, “the OTA is a confederacy, wherein numerous tribes operate mostly independently of the central authority. Certain tribes did engage in atrocities, and my administration responded by sanctioning those tribes, by ordering central forces to prevent any further atrocities, and by ordering an investigation of those atrocities.” “Rhodesia is intervening here not to prevent ethnic cleansing, something it could have done through purely diplomatic means, but to prop up its dictatorial NAFO regime,” Guleed went onto say, “and the OTA shall resist Rhodesian oppression just as we resisted the oppression of the Oynenyuan Free State for 31 years.”
Independent analysts suggested that the truth lay somewhere between the claims of Heleck and Guleed. “There is clear evidence that numerous OTA tribes engaged in ethnic cleansing with the tacit endorsement of the OTA,” said Dr. Ernest Minate, PhD, a professor of international affairs at Shiro Academy at Tilden University, “but there is no evidence that the OTA actually endorsed, supported, or organized those efforts, except when it came to prisoners of war, many of whom the OTA has executed regardless of race.” “The OTA did order an end to any actions against Felinds, but that order has been largely ignored,” Minate went onto say, “but on the other hand, it is possible that diplomatic pressure could have forced better enforcement of the order.” “Ultimately,” Minate concluded, “the OTA is rather guilty, but Rhodesia is likely acting in large part to further its interests in Oynenyua.”
The international community appeared to strongly support the Rhodesian intervention despite this fact. Free Pacifican President Christopher Arctoris lauded Rhodesia for intervening, saying that “I applaud President Heleck for acting swiftly to end these atrocities, to restore order in this war-torn nation, and to promote peace.” The Xiopothan and Lyonese governments issued similar statements of support for the peacekeeping effort, though Xiopothan and Lyonese officials urged Heleck to pursue peace negotiations amongst the various Oynenyuan factions before authorizing aggressive military action. Maxtopia, Bigtopia, and Equatorial Kundu, the major foreign supporters of the OTA, withdrew their support following the Rhodesian strikes, though each nation encouraged autonomy to be granted to the tribal peoples of Eastern Oynenyuan.
Rhodesia stood in an immensely superior strategic position today given its willingness to commit ground forces, and given the withdrawal of foreign support for the OTA, but experts warned against counting the OTA out. The OTA successfully waged a guerrilla campaign against Oynenyuan Free State forces for thirty-one years, preventing the dictatorial regime of Hanif Mifsud from ever gaining complete control of Eastern Oynenyua. Given the likelihood that it will take 4-6 weeks for Rhodesian forces to arrive in significant numbers in Oynenyua, the OTA will have a great deal of time in which to prepare once again to engage in asymmetrical warfare. “The OTA has never engaged in conventional warfare,” Professor Minate noted, “and they won’t here, either – but that doesn’t mean they’ll give up.”
The Rhodesian intervention nonetheless marked the most significant opportunity in years for order to be restored in Oynenyua, a former Codexian colony that last enjoyed domestic harmony in 1973. Army Colonel Hanif Mifsud overthrew the Oynenyuan Republic in a coup that year, taking advantage of widespread unhappiness with the corrupt, wasteful, and incompetent central administration. Mifsud established a highly effective regime that provided unprecedentedly efficient, consistent, and fair services. Yet Mifsud viciously targeted his political enemies, and he abolished the local autonomy that had long defined the nation. A number of Eastern tribes formed a coalition that year to resist Mifsud’s rule, leading a 31-year insurgency against the dictator. Mifsud remained popular through most of the rest of the nation, however, until an economic slump in the 1990s. A number of rebel groups rose up to oppose his regime over the next decade, ultimately overthrowing his administration in 2004.
A civil war broke out in late 2004 when these various rebel groups failed to agree upon a new government. A dozen factions emerged, and fought an increasingly brutal civil war over the next twelve years. Five factions ultimately gained supremacy: the Rhodesian-backed NAFO, the Transmassian-backed communist Democratic Republic of Oynenyua, the breakaway Matamban-backed United Abakamoso Democratic Front, and the OTA, which received Maxtopian, Bigtopian, and Equatorial Kundun support. The NAFO controls most of the Northwest of the nation, the DRO the Northeast, the UADF the Southwest, and the OTA the South-center. Mifsud, who survived the revolt, still holds the capital of D’hana-Oza. Forces loyal to Mifsud, who have the backing of neighboring Nambutu and Tsumebia, hold a sliver of territory in the South of the country. The Federated Alliance, along with most other foreign governments, have remained neutral in the conflict, refusing to endorse any faction, shuttering their embassies, and issuing harsh travel warnings.
The Rhodesian intervention might finally put an end to that dynamic, though if President Heleck wishes to permanently restore order, his work will be cut out for him.