Liberate Land of the Liberals

World Assembly Center The Security Council
1

Liberate Land of the Liberals

A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region

Category: Liberation

Nominee (region): Land of the Liberals

Proposed by: Environmental Rebels

Description: The Security Council,

SURPRISED that Land of the Liberals was invaded by New earth with help from the notorious Nazi europe on December 23, 2009;

NOTING that New Earth now claims the region to be their colony;

DEFINING…
(a)“Preventive Liberation” as the action of liberating a presently non-password protected region to prevent the use of the password in the future (e.g. as seen in SC#9);

FEARING that New Earth will refound the region;

FURTHER FEARING that they would disgrace the Land of the Liberals’ very name by residing with undemocratic policies;

AWARE that it may be only a matter of days before all the natives are ejected and the invaders password the region;

RECALLING that New Earth has already banned two native nations The Sleepy Backwater of Anbrig and The Republic of Galactic Intrigue at the creation of this resolution;

CERTAIN that if the region is liberated by the Security Council it would be unlikely that the invaders could refound the region, atleast not without a fair amount of difficulty;

WISHING the natives of Land of the Liberals to live free from the threat of refounding and future raids;

HEREBY:

PREVENTIVELY LIBERATES the Land of the Liberals to protect the region from the implementation of a password.

Co-authored by Unibot

2

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=30262 is the link for this in the WA forum.

Summary and my vote…later! RL is calling.

3

THey need o give ACORN some tax break and they will come in and liberate them, and put whores in suburbs where they can more easily serve their customers. . .

4

I skimmed through the WA thread and what i saw is that even the co-author of this resolution is against it, as the author is a raider/invader that moved on to other target but is trying to prevent an eventual password on it (under the claim of preventive liberation), to ensure he can re-take the region whenever he wants. The author contests it, but i saw little support to his claim.
Its also said that WA should be neutral in the defenderxraider war, that this conflict is important to keep NS alive and that there is no native supporting the resolution.

5

And i vote against because as much as i dislike invaders, i think WA shouldn´t bother with a region whose natives don´t want help.

6

Just seems like a great waste of the World Assemblies time, like most of the Security Council resolutions.

7

Made my say today.

8

— Begin quote from ____

THey need o give ACORN some tax break and they will come in and liberate them, and put whores in suburbs where they can more easily serve their customers. . .

— End quote

Careful now.

9

Against.

No passwords!

10

The bill was defeated 3,044 votes to 1,512.

11

Thanks Bai! I don´t know why, but i was thinking the voting would end tomorrow…