# \[NOMINATION\] Arbiter: Folly

**URL:** <https://forum.theeastpacific.com/t/nomination-arbiter-folly/19322>\
**Category:** The Magisterium\
**Tags:** nomination\
**Created:** [September 3, 2025, 11:20pm UTC](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/t/nomination-arbiter-folly/19322 "2025-09-03T23:20:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lucklife](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/user_avatar/forum.theeastpacific.com/lucklife/32/11496_2.png) [@Lucklife](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/u/Lucklife)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2025, 6:10am UTC](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/t/nomination-arbiter-folly/19322/14 "2025-09-04T06:10:48Z")

</div>

Thanks for the confirmation Folly. Time to move to more substantive questions.

You previously motioned for a repeal of an OGO with no evidence.

> [@\[REPEAL\] Order of the Golden Ocelot - Xoriet](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/t/repeal-order-of-the-golden-ocelot-xoriet/19233/4):
>
> You propose to repeal the Order awarded to Xoriet because you believe they are no longer deserving of it. The only explanation so far here is the claim that they “performed contrary to the Orders original intent”, pointing to evidence not yet added. Even if the evidence is not to be added yet, I would think providing some explanation as to when, how, .. Xoriet acted as such, would be advisable?

This is concerning, especially for an Arbiter whose lives would revolve around judging evidence and interpretation of laws.

What would you say about this?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.theeastpacific.com/t/nomination-arbiter-folly/19322)._