UNDERSTANDING: The intention of the Animal Protection Act to prevent abuse and mistreatment.
HOWEVER REALIZING: That the resolution provides no definition, or differentiations between “people” and “animals”
NOTING: That most sapient life, can be described as a “person” or an “animal” interchangeably.
FURTHER REALIZING: That without this definition, sapient life could be subject to the same domesticating and servitude that “animals” are.
DISCERNED: That the definition of an “owner”, under this resolution would consider any wildlife on a “persons” property for more than 31 days their property, and responsibility.
SADDENED: That this act, discourages “owners” from having domesticated indoor house pets.
HERBY: Repeals General Assembly Resolution #228 Animal Protection Act