[Campaign] Elect Domais Archon!



I know many of you have likely wondered, and perhaps been baffled, about my recent actions. You probably asked yourselves why I – who until very recently had my WA in Lazarus, served as Prime Minister for over a year, and remain an off-site member of the Lazarene Security Council – would decide to transition my focus to The East Pacific.

To be quite frank, throughout my years-long tenure in Lazarus and in every other region where I have had the pleasure of being a citizen, my goal has always been straightforward: to soar to new heights together, to climb to the summit of Mount Olympus, and to realize the region’s potential for greatness. It’s really that simple. I want to see everything that could be improved be improved to its maximum potential, and for the region to be the best version of itself for everyone trying to enjoy themselves playing there.

After all, why be second-rate when, employing a modicum of effort, you could be first-rate? Why be weak when, with a spark of initiative, you could just be strong? Why lose when, with a little bit of effort, you could easily win across the board? You may think I am joking or being overly dramatic, but make no mistake: I have asked myself these questions.

There is a popular myth that Restorers are inactive by their very nature; I disagree. Just because nations are refounded there does not mandate that the community be dormant. Lazarus itself has experienced periods of sustained, extreme activity, like during the era of the People’s Republic of Lazarus. If Restorers are doomed from the jump, how is it that other regions with far less history and prestige can do much more with far less?

No, inactivity is not a fundamental or inescapable law of Restorers. Any stagnation we see stems from a general mindset of complacency within the leadership. It’s reminiscent of a lethargic dragon that, instead of expanding its hoard, simply sits atop a mountain of gold and sleeps. And this is fine, if others are content to play at a slower pace. My personality drives me to constant activity, constant analysis, constant action: traits better suited to The East Pacific than the current environment in Lazarus. I still love Lazarus and my good friends Roger, Wang Yao, and Feux. It’s just that there is nothing left for me to do.

So, that explains why I have transitioned my focus away from Lazarus, but why join The East Pacific? For me, there is no other place besides a Feeder region, a region that is just active by nature. Of the Feeders, The East Pacific was the obvious choice. During my time as Prime Minister of Lazarus, I had nothing but many positive interactions with the East Pacific. I viewed The East Pacific and Lazarus as, for the most part, having each other’s backs and being on the same page – on the same page when it really mattered.

I make no attempt to hide my friendship with A Mean Old Man; from the moment I met him in late 2024, I knew that we would get along well. And I won’t deny that playing in the same region as AMOM was not a contributing factor, but it was not the only one.

For months, even before my transition, I had been contributing to The East Pacific in small ways, such as voting myself out of citizenship when I thought the law change was justified, voting with the region in critical votes in the Magisterium, developing and sharing Anarcha (recruitment tools for the executive and endorsement tools for the Viziers) and, overall, contributing to the security and development of this region. In that time I became accustomed to the people here, who have been nothing but nice to me, and the region’s government, which suits my play style better than anyone else’s.

At the end of the day, it’s honestly that simple.

With that out of the way, let’s discuss the plans for the future:

For far too long, The East Pacific has been viewed by certain foreign actors as their personal sandbox. We have made tremendous steps already towards changing this fact by making it harder to influence us – i.e. HoGs, etc. Now that we are in a better position internally, we can focus our efforts externally and regain our place in the sun.

To accomplish this end, our focus should be on building relations with new and up-and-coming UCRs. Not just via treaties, but by actually engaging their communities and building bona fide relationships with their members. To wit, I propose reforming what it means to be an ambassador: not simply posting updates (though, no doubt, some will), but by actually engaging with the assigned community. Naturally, all of this will support cultural efforts described below, as a part of this effort would be hosting events such as game nights with interested UCRs.

We will continue developing and improving the other relationships we have but our primary focus should be building a new Foreign Affairs with contemporary regions.

Culture has always seemed strange to me in this region. The last few governments seemed to have also struggled with it. In my opinion, regular voice chats, game nights, and trying to engage other regions in these activities (as explained above) are the general foundation of culture on NationStates. Besides this, as detailed below, our focus should be on internal engagement.

There is also a project in the works to mirror the RMB to Discord, which should help us keep track of and better moderate the RMB.

While manual recruitment is important, especially while we do not have an API script up and running, once this is achieved (i.e. AMOM finally sets up my script), manual recruitment will become less of a priority. Furthermore, the returns on manual recruitment are so low that it is not really worth spending too much time on it, when it can be automated – I would know since I created my own recruitment bot. Indeed, there are other avenues of engagement that will be far more rewarding to spend human resources on.

Notably, internal recruitment. That is, sending telegrams to nations while they are online to join the World Assembly, apply for citizenship, etc. I am already working on a bot that will send us Discord notifications when a nation creates a happening, so that we can immediately send them a telegram.

Overall, I am not looking for any major overhauls of ESPA, as it has been running well on its own (with a few exceptions). To be honest, while I am a member of ESPA, agree that we need a strong military, and support the continued building of the organization, I am not very interested in being “Admiral,” nor is it “my project.” I would rather leave the daily operations of ESPA to the professionals, though major operations would have to be run by me and the FA department.

Can we close this? Are other people okay with that?

I feel like, as it stands, EPNS is very forced, in the sense that we have to come up with things to say just to meet some arbitrary quota. That’s why, as Minister of News, I have only released a single edition regarding Cordone, because that’s something people will actually read about. I believe we can make the format more concise. My idea is that EPNS should be a short, bulleted list of things that have happened, without any fluff. For major newsworthy items, we can publish detailed articles. And, of course, people who want to write more extensive articles can still submit them. I was also thinking about making a bot where people could submit articles and have them reviewed internally.

Regardless of the results of the election, I will continue developing new and innovative tools to make everyone’s lives easier, as well as maintaining the current tools I have already created, such as Anarcha. Currently, I am in the process of making a bot that will help out with, among other things, citizenship audits, mirroring the RMB to Discord, and, as explained above, internal engagement. I am open to suggestions for new tools. If you need anything, please let me know. I cannot promise a quick turnaround, as there are many projects already in the concept phase.

We will continue to our efforts in the World Assembly as we have had decent success in recent months. There have been some wins on proposals with TEP authors, targets and co-authors, such as Commend Brethren, Repeal: “Condemn Lone Wolves United,” and the soon-to-be passed Daybreak. We will continue to support TEP authors and co-authors who want to draft proposals in the General Assembly and Sec Gen. Overall, the WA Ministry has been doing good work, and I hope to continue this trend.

On the tech side of things, I am working on tools for the WA to help us campaign and the likes. Some of it is ready, and some of it is just in the concept phase.

In conclusion, I would like to automate NationStates as much as possible, while supporting business as usual. We are here to socialize and have fun, as well as engage in legal reviews and other fun stuff. The less time spent on mindless and monotonous clerical or admin work, the more productive we can be on things that actually matter. Again, I have no plans to pause any of the bot work if I don’t win. If I do, however, having the authority to make decisions could speed things along. From tools that help us automate citizenship audits to those that monitor the RMB and make creating news easier, all of these initiatives will greatly improve our daily experience.

Thank you,
Domais

Interesting campaign, and not one I expected to see!

  1. You note that you’d like ambassadors to take on a more active role in the communities they’re assigned to. This is already the goal, it has been for a very long time, it just doesn’t eventuate. What are you going to do differently to former Delegates to ensure ambassadors are active in their communities?

  2. On the topic of ambassadors, given the chronic understaffing and inactivity in the executive, how are you going to ensure our ambassadorial roles are sufficiently staffed? If you’re unable to allocate ambassadors to every FA posting, who will be prioritised, and who will be left without representation?

  3. You wish to build new connections with up-and-coming UCRs. Can you give us a few examples of who you’ll be starting with?

  4. Your Culture section is quite brief. The culture ministry has historically struggled to generate activity and interest in TEP, despite the laid-back nature of the community and the importance of fostering a unified, friendly community. What will you do differently to past delegates to ensure culture is a success?

  5. I like what I’m seeing with recruitment. So long as we can keep automated systems running (and get them online to begin with), I think that will do a lot to mitigate our comparatively low WA participation compared to other feeders.

  6. I don’t really love the idea of closing UTEP, but given we’re in a staffing crisis… ehhhhhh? Can you clarify if this is a wider goal or a result of lack of staffing and a reallocation of priorities?

  7. I agree that EPNS is a bit forced. We don’t need long-winded articles about nothing happening for the 4th edition straight. Can you go into more detail about how you’d manage EPNS? What changes would you make to edition structures? Would we still write for external eyes, or would we shift to writing EPNS mostly for domestic audiences? Would you keep updates from ministries? How would you structure Urth and Valsora pieces; would you go looking for their features or have them come to you?

  8. Is your tech open-source? We’d want to ensure we aren’t overreliant on one person’s tech, only to lose it and be adrift when they depart.

  9. Your campaign seems quite heavy on just automating everything we can. This is good, but you repeatedly state that you’ll work on this regardless of whether you’re elected Archon. You argue that having the authority to make decisions could speed things along. From the way you’ve presented it, all we need is an Archon who’s in direct communication with you, who’s happy to adopt your tech in a timely manner. My question then would be, why do you need/want to be Archon? What else motivates you to take on the role?

I am a big fan of automation, but I also want to know what you bring to the table besides that. Leading the region is as much about how you engage with the community as it is innovating how we do things.

With that said, I’m glad someone is bringing a different approach this campaign season, and I look forward to seeing how your work continues to benefit TEP, whether as Archon or otherwise. Thank you and best of luck!

I really like that this campaign focuses less on Executive restructuring.

Some questions:

  1. Dremaur states in his campaign "Let’s take a moment to talk about our wayward cultural centerpieces: UTEP and EPNS. It’s no secret that these departments are on life support, and that’s something we need to fix. " Yet you say that the lack of articles is purposeful. My concern here, then, is was your plan to move away from monthly articles to as-needed articles ever communicated to Dremaur once you became MON? If not, why wasn’t this communicated? And if it was communicated, then why wasn’t this reinforced? It seems you two have different opinions on the standards of quality for EPNS, which is concerning for Archon candidates since it represents a lack of communication between two high-level Executive positions.

  2. For EPNS, you state people can write extensive articles as well. I submitted an article to EPNS that I dont think was ever published? What happened to that and how do you plan to follow through on creating an article system that accepts articles? (I also may have just not seen it lol)

  3. To follow up on that - do you plan to solicit articles yourself? While I agree that EPNS probably shouldn’t be releasing full monthly issues (keeping it to monthly FA updates supplemented by periodic EPNS releases is great), you probably won’t get many articles if you aren’t asking people to write some.

  4. Why havent you started doing monthly updates as Minister of News, seeing as it’s in your campaign?

  5. Im okay with closing UTEP as long as the current forums stay where they are and anyone interested is allowed to pick it up if they come along. I dont think UTEP should be like wiped out. It has value as a written archive, and honestly we can start saving epns articles in it.

  6. Im just going to note that constant manual recruitment (with or without script assistance) has a lot more long term returns in nation numbers than API. I know this cuz Ive sent 100k+ tgs for a UCR.

    Not to say it isnt worth our time to do integration instead, I think working on one or the other is fine for now since both take lots of effort and both arent in an ideal state right now. But anyone from a UCR can tell you that API alone cant replace manual/stamps, really.

  7. As Archon, do you plan to yourself reach out to people you find promising, or at least finding skmeone else to do so? Automation is good, but as past Delegates have shown when we had r3n WA telegrams and etc, automation is thoroughly beaten out by someone personally reaching out with a genuine inquiry.

  8. How do you plan to make culture interesting for newer players to host their own events?

  9. Why was your campaign so late? As an Archon candidate, it isnt a great sign of activity/interest when your campaign is posted on the last day of nominations.

Good luck.

I hope that this post answers the questions raised by both Merlo and Zuk. Instead of doing a traditional quote-by-quote reply, I’ve tried to touch on each topic brought up in the questions naturally as a part of a broader vision. Please let me know if this doesn’t adequately answer your questions, and I will be happy to provide further clarification.

Before moving forward, I want to clear up some confusion regarding what I mean by “automated engagement,” as I admit I’ve been a bit inconsistent with my terminology.

Let me explain what the engagement tool (which is currently in the testing phase) does:
It watches the happenings for issues being answered, RMB posts, dispatch creation, etc. and then sends a notification in DMs to interested people. This notification includes a telegram template (that is set per user) and a confirm button. You click on the link, send the telegram, and then press confirm. The bot then edits its message for everyone on the mailing list, saying it was confirmed and by whom. The bot also has built-in anti-spam so we are only getting one ping if a user causes 15 happenings in 5 minutes. The entire goal of this is to be able to send telegrams to nations instructing them to join the WA, apply for citizenship, or whatever else we chose while they are actively online. This is what is meant by automated engagement. In this light, the engagement tool is essentially a manual tool which automatically watches the happenings.

In this response, when I say automate, I do not mean just have the API do everything for us. There may still be human interaction required, just that, the parts of the job we all hate are replaced by bots.

FA
Generally speaking, the traditional system of ambassadors – where we send someone somewhere, ideally to every embassy partner – to watch and monitor their community and post updates while reporting back to FA leadership should be, for the most part, abandoned. It’s ineffective and, in many ways, a waste of human resources.

To elaborate, my experience has shown that very few regions, if any, actually care that an embassy partner or whatever has a diplomat posted in their Discord. For example, when I was Prime Minister of Lazarus there wasn’t a time when every treaty partner had an ambassador assigned. The position was basically treated as busywork that you just gave to people so they had something to do, but are not necessarily looking to get anything else out of it.

And honestly? Looking back, in the grand scheme of things, would it have made any difference if all the slots had been filed? Absolutely not. People, by and large, are not making important FA decisions on the basis of whether or not some region has an ambassador assigned on some spreadsheet.

Why is this? It is because, in this game, people care much more about what happens behind closed doors than who, if anyone, is their ambassador. Having a full roster of ambassadors is just window dressing, what actually matters is the relationship between the people who actually make decisions within regions. That’s the hard truth.

Therefore, instead of wasting limited resources on this model of diplomacy, which even when fully realized, the benefits are little, we should instead focus on a select few regions to send multiple people as ambassadors.

For example, let’s say we chose to focus on Region A, we would then send 2-3 people as ambassadors to that one region. When they see VCs happening and they are available, they would join. Then would interact with the key players in said region. We would join their cultural events and we would invite them to ours.

With UCRs, the plan would be to find a few regions that are neutral and then engage them in the way I described above. The exact regions would be determined, after an in-depth review, by the FA council based upon general consensus.

In my opinion, this is how we should be doing FA in the modern game.

I cannot currently speak to specifics, this is just a general outline that would certainly have some modifications once implemented, based upon community feedback. In addition, I cannot provide specific regions, this would be decided after an in-depth discussion with the FA council.

I hope that clarifies my position on this topic.

Culture
My main focus here would be cultural events, such as game nights, VCs, browsers based games that people who don’t want to join VC could play, etc. There would be a focus on doing events, festivals, VCs, etc. with other regions, as detailed in the FA section of my response.

I know my campaign has been heavily focused on tech, but it cannot be helped. If used correctly, the engagement tool should get more people in the Discord, which would then be used as a springboard to do bigger and better things. Simply by actively VCing or whatever and having good internal engagement, culture will naturally follow.

Therefore, when considering my ideas on culture, you have to take into account the entire vision, as each element builds upon the last. I take a holistic view, while there may not be much to directly do with culture that hasn’t already been tried, it is in combination with tech and FA that the picture can be clearly seen. Someone could look at the individual pieces of a LEGO set and say, “this isn’t much,” when it is actually the totality of all the bricks put together that gives it value.

UTEP
My view is that we don’t have the staff necessary to run UTEP and that there are more important projects to focus on, such as internal engagement. I am open to keeping it open officially but it would be towards the bottom of the priority list.

Recruitment
I understand that, when recruiting externally, you get the best results using all three methods (Stamps, API, and Manual); however, there are a very limited number of people who will sit and send telegrams for hours, I think their time would be better spent on internal engagement than external recruitment, especially once the API script is setup.

Furthermore, we are in a Feeder region, so we get a lot of spawns already. The spawns we naturally get plus the API script should give us enough new members to hold us over. Once we have more staff, we can do both internal engagement and external recruitment.

Me and AMOM did extensive testing during the rollout of Anarcha, the returns on our campaigns were miniscule in comparison to the time invested. You have to be doing it constantly to make headway. Therefore, I think that it is more valuable to have people send telegrams to nations already within the region telling them to join the WA, get citizenship, etc. than to send telegrams asking people to join the region.

EPNS
I have added to my agenda for the current project an ability to submit articles through a bot. This article would then be posted in a channel, pinging the news staff. There would then be buttons to approve, deny, or suggest edits. There could even be a category system for different types of articles, the details to be worked out once I start working on it. You could submit articles from any of TEP’s servers, so it would seamlessly integrate all aspects of our community. Then the bot would, at a press of a button, generate the BBCode for a forum post and would post the edition in a Discord channel. There could also be a post in a channel towards the top of the server that would have an always there submit button.

Addressing Zuk’s point on missed articles, this system would make it virtually impossible to miss things because all submissions would be centralized.

Regarding monthly articles, we can do monthly articles with in-depth text if people actually submit articles. If we had 5 people all writing extensive stuff, then, yes, we would do lengthy monthly editions. If not, then either skip that month or post a short summary.

Though this is just a rough draft, the actual product would differ in some ways, as whenever I implement things there are naturally considerations that I did not think of during the planning phase. For example, the first version of Anarcha was just a simple bot with no UI, all that came later because I was inspired.

This system hasn’t been implemented because I have been working on other more important projects and haven’t had the chance.

Bots
When I first made Anarcha, I did consider making the project open source, but ultimately decided against it. I thought that if I made it open source, certain people in certain circles would steal my code and ideas, integrate it into their projects, refuse to give me credit, say that it is just AI slop, falsely accuse me of stealing their code, and relentlessly attack me. While it is true that open sourcing the bot would have helped with mass adoption, that was never really the point of Anarcha. Anarcha was and is essentially a private tool I offered to select regions as a courtesy. In addition, Anarcha and my other projects are not fit for public release because they could be used against us. Imagine if we gave Fifth Empire Overwatch for example, it would be a disaster. For those reasons, I ultimately decided against open sourcing the bot.

All the current projects in the works are private internal tools created for TEP and our friends. Therefore, I do not see how open sourcing any of The Anarcha Project’s tools benefits us. However, this does not mean I am against sharing the code with others. In deed, I am open to sharing the code on a private repository, shared with trusted members of this community, such as EM.

Addressing Lateness In Posting My Campaign
I was very busy during this first week of July, I had planned to get it out sooner but life got in the way. But I am here now.

Conclusion
It is true that I will work on tech regardless of the outcome, indeed, I am not Archon but am working on these things, being Archon would allow me to make executive decisions that will advance this overall vision. For example, I can allocate resources towards internal engagement.

I, for one, think my focus on tech is justified. In a world where we have limited resources, our focus should be to develop infrastructure that will simply make everyone’s lives easier in the long run and free them to do other things. When people do not have to watch the happenings to see when people are online and are instead notified automatically by a bot, we are naturally going to have a more active region. When people do not have to spend hours doing a citizenship audit, they are free to do other, more productive, things. When people don’t have to waste their time formatting articles, there will naturally be more articles written.

When I first launched Anarcha, I said it was a Technological Revolution. I did not say that because a recruitment bot is special, but because, even then, I was thinking about some of these projects. So honestly, I think that tech is worthy of being the primary focus of an Archon because it will enable us to do grand things that we cannot currently do because we are all working on stuff that we, quite frankly, find annoying and boring. Let’s focus on the stuff that matters in a social game and let the tech help us with the rest.

I end this post with this, while everyone knows that, for example, we could watch the happenings manually, should we and will we?