— Begin quote from ____
Great work Zuk!
As for the Viziers and LOA, an option would be to give more than 72 hours time to accommodate for temporary absences?
— End quote
Yep, that works.
But in that case, would another addition or change to this law be required? The Conclave could probably utilize common sense, should a Vizier declare an official LOA.
How much time would be given?
— Begin quote from ____
— Begin quote from ____
Great work Zuk!
As for the Viziers and LOA, an option would be to give more than 72 hours time to accommodate for temporary absences?
— End quote
Yep, that works.
But in that case, would another addition or change to this law be required? The Conclave could probably utilize common sense, should a Vizier declare an official LOA.
How much time would be given?
— End quote
Yes and no. If we legislate what can be regarded as “absence” to remove a Vizier, it takes away the need for interpretation and discussion on that point, which should allow the Conclave to act more decisively if needed. I would say if a Vizier hasn’t checked in a week, that’s quite enough?
Yea, that works
If so, we get :
— Begin quote from ____
…5.5. Any Vizier having less than 50 endorsements above the Delegate-Friendly Endorsement Cap for more than 1 week shall be regarded as absent and can be removed by the Conclave.
— End quote
— Begin quote from ____
If so, we get :
— Begin quote from ____
…5.5. Any Vizier having less than 50 endorsements above the Delegate-Friendly Endorsement Cap for more than 1 week shall be regarded as absent and can be removed by the Conclave.
— End quote
— End quote
Ye, that works me thinks.
Sent from my SM-J327P using Tapatalk
I move this to a vote, given that the last proposed amendment be amended as such in the last proposed text.
I second this.
When editing this act, please also remove the double “to” towards the end of §6.4
Thank you.
— Begin quote from ____
When editing this act, please also remove the double “to” towards the end of §6.4
Thank you.
— End quote
Good catch!