You are right. Turns out we did indeed include it and it’s mentioned in the Library, but it didn’t get on this list for some reason. Thanks Uni.
(http://theeastpacific.com/topic/5173280/1/)
EDIT: If you know of any other works which would give more balance to the debate, please don’t hesitate to add them too. I’d assume you are the NS expert in this field.
You see the problem is that before Region Influence, Defenderism’s moral argument was so widely accepted, there weren’t too many “this is why defending is good” pieces – while there were many “this is why invading is good and defending is bad” articles.
I think in the Post-Influence world, defenders needed to kick themselves and re-evaluate why they were doing what they were doing. Paradise Found was that for me.
There are no tests, since that was a real hassle to keep up with, however I was thinking if there’s interest in this from more people (and if Uni maybe would like to participate) we can organize some sort of forum debate or talk on it in the University.
Alternatively, write a little work on it yourself and you just might get an academic grade from our University
Here’s a Utilitarian one…
