[th]REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW[/th]
LAW IN QUESTION
The Eastern Pacific Sovereign Army Act - The East Pacific - Tapatalk , specifically Section 2.2
LEGAL QUESTIONS
OR CHALLENGES
The EPSA has before been dispatched to deal with regions deemed Nazi, fascist, transphobic, and the like. This is an IC law, obviously scoped to only providing IC action against all activities that could have IC meaning (Nazis or fascists in government or community attracting others to enter, actions of government officials tarnishing reputation and regional policy by being anti-LGBT+, etc.)
By similar extension,
- Is a region that is deemed by wide consensus “OOC bad” by the popular NS community be an exception as listed in Section 2.2.3?
- Could a known Do-not-Defend (DnD) order be an exception, if suitable reasons in Section 2.2.3 are cited?
- Confirming, especially in the case of a negative response to any above, that such behaviors as being transphobic, homophobic, racist, etc., are all acceptable ideologies would qualify as an exception to Section 2.2.3?
REVIEW ADVANCED BY-
(indicate with “X”)
Aurora Yukihime
…Delegate
( )
…Magisterium
( )
…Other Party
(please indicate which)
( X) (Citizen)