[JUDICIAL REVIEW] Request: On Delegate Elections Failure to Conduct Procedure

Request for Judicial Review
LAW IN QUESTION Delegate Elections Act
LEGAL QUESTIONS OR CHALLENGES 1. Is there any recourse if the viziers A) fail to action Section 7.1 and B) also fail to conduct the same procedures?
2. If a judgement from Question 1 states one or more viziers may be charged with Failure to Conduct Procedure, or a similar offense requiring this procedure, is it a conflict of interest for viziers to vote on whether any vizier(s) may be unable to conduct elections and referendums for one year?
3. Is it a conflict of interest for the viziers to vote on whether the Viceroy may be unable to conduct elections and referendums for one year when they also failed to do so?
4. Could a severe enough breach of election procedure deem an election totally improper and require redo?
5. If there is an affirmative judgement to Question 4, is it sufficiently severe when neither body actions Section 3.9 and/or 7.1 until sufficiently far into or after conclusion of the nomination period?
REVIEW ADVANCED BY- (indicate with "X ") Albrook
…Delegate ()
…Magisterium ()
…Other Party (Citizen) (X)

I made several edits since the initial post.

2 now clarifies the similar charge and refers to the stated judgement, expecting clarity.

5 now splits questioning for sections 3.9 and 7.1 with “and/or” instead of only the one case with “and”. It also corrects reference to “after conclusion” of the nomination period.

Withdrawn after clarification on procedure.