Turns out Serge wasn’t a registered voter and no one realised until it was too late.
So I’m nominating him again for the same position!
im gonna go ahead and show my support for this, as i did the first time 
Lmao altys
Nothing to state, all to vote
The nomination of Libertanny the parrot as an arbiter in the East Pacific region on NationStates raises significant concerns regarding the suitability of parrots for judicial roles. While parrots are undoubtedly fascinating creatures, their inherent limitations make them ill-suited for the complex and critical responsibilities of a judicial position. This essay will outline three primary reasons why Libertanny, or any parrot for that matter, should not be nominated as an arbiter: their limited cognitive abilities, their inherent nature as parrots, and their perceived nerdiness.
Parrots, despite their ability to mimic human speech and showcase impressive feats of memory, possess inherently limited cognitive abilities. Judicial positions require individuals capable of intricate legal analysis, critical thinking, and the application of complex principles. Parrots lack the intellectual capacity and understanding required to interpret and evaluate legal arguments effectively. Their reliance on repetition and mimicry, rather than comprehension, is insufficient for the nuanced decision-making demanded in the judicial realm. Consequently, relying on Libertanny, or any parrot, as an arbiter risks undermining the integrity and effectiveness of the judicial process.
Parrots, by nature, are not designed to fulfill judicial roles. Their natural instincts and behavioral patterns differ significantly from the qualities essential for an arbiter. Parrots are known for their avian instincts, which include flight, foraging, and social interactions within their own species. These instinctive behaviors are essential to their survival but do not align with the requirements of a judicial position. Parrots lack the temperament, objectivity, and ability to detach personal inclinations that are necessary for impartial decision-making. Expecting a parrot to embody the qualities of a fair and unbiased arbiter is akin to asking a fish to climb a tree - it is inherently incompatible with their nature.
While it may seem irrelevant, the perceived nerdiness of parrots, exemplified by Libertanny, further undermines their suitability as arbiters. Nerdy characteristics, such as excessive focus on technical details or being overly pedantic, may hinder effective communication and interaction with other stakeholders within the judicial system. The role of an arbiter involves collaboration, persuasion, and the ability to engage in meaningful discourse with legal professionals and the public. Parrots, with their perceived nerdy tendencies, may struggle to establish rapport and trust, which are crucial for effective decision-making and maintaining public confidence in the judiciary.
While Libertanny the parrot and other parrots like him undoubtedly possess unique attributes and can provide joy and entertainment to their human companions, their nomination as arbiters in the East Pacific on NationStates is ill-advised. The limitations of parrots’ cognitive abilities, their inherent nature as parrots, and their perceived nerdiness are fundamental obstacles that prevent them from effectively carrying out the responsibilities of a judicial position. To maintain the integrity and professionalism of the judicial system, it is crucial to select individuals with the necessary intellectual capabilities, temperament, and interpersonal skills. As such, parrots, including Libertanny, should not be considered for such positions, ensuring the continued confidence and trust of the public in the judicial process.
-chatgpt
(i support the nomination, obv)
1 Like
counterargument; we had a horse as a Delegate, i think we can allow a parrot into arbitership.
can we train him to say “Aivintis is the best”? wont vote for otherwise
I concur with Aivintis
With no questions asked yet, I’m motioning this to vote.
Motioning to vote again, apparently the previous one got ghosted ):
Seconded.
Libertanny the Parrot would indeed be an unconventional but intriguing choice for the position of Arbiter in The East Pacific in the online game NationStates. Here are a few reasons why Libertanny could be an amazing choice for this role:
Neutrality and Fairness: As a parrot, Libertanny does not have any political bias or personal agenda. This neutrality can be advantageous in an arbiter, as it ensures that judgments are based solely on the facts and merits of each case. Libertanny’s judgments would be free from any personal biases or external influences, promoting fairness and equal treatment for all nations in The East Pacific.
Strong Analytical Skills: Parrots are known for their intelligence and ability to mimic and understand complex patterns. Libertanny’s keen observational skills and analytical thinking would enable them to carefully analyze the evidence and arguments presented in each case. They would be able to assess different perspectives and reach well-informed decisions based on the available information.
Transparency and Accountability: Libertanny’s presence as the Arbiter would bring a sense of transparency to the judicial process. As a parrot, they cannot be swayed by corruption or political pressures, making them an impartial figure. Libertanny would be accountable only to the principles of justice and the rule of law, ensuring that their decisions are guided by integrity and the best interests of The East Pacific.
Unique Perspective: Libertanny’s avian perspective would offer a fresh outlook on issues and conflicts within The East Pacific. Their unique ability to perceive and interpret situations differently could help in uncovering alternative solutions or overlooked aspects. This diversity of perspective could enrich the discussions and deliberations in the region, promoting creative thinking and problem-solving.
Engaging and Memorable Presence: Having Libertanny the Parrot as the Arbiter would inject an element of charm and fun into the region. Their charismatic nature and memorable character would make the judicial process more approachable and engaging for nations in The East Pacific. Libertanny’s presence could encourage active participation and interest in the region’s affairs, contributing to a vibrant and thriving community.
While selecting an avian arbiter like Libertanny may seem unorthodox, their impartiality, intelligence, unique perspective, and engaging presence make them a potentially excellent choice for the role.
~chatgpt
Counterpoint: Libertanny’s history with the corrupt organization the Eastern Union, led by notorious horse mob boss Marrabuk, has proven that his status as a parrot does not make him immune to corruption. In fact, he has been known for susceptibility to bribes and the external pressures of Eastern Union cronies within the geopolitical sphere. As applied to the position of Arbiter, this could be potentially disastrous for the region.