In accordance with Article I, Section 2 of the Concordat and Section 4.5.2 of the Standing Orders of the Magisterium , The Provost of the Magisterium hereby notifies the Conclave of the passage of [A-2024-22] Amendment to the Concordat , containing the following Proposed Concordat Amendment.
Article A: Executive
Section 1
This Concordat does hereby invest executive authority in a Delegate of The East Pacific and does appoint the Delegate the executor of this Concordat, subsequent laws passed by the Magisterium, and orders Orders and verdicts imposed by the Conclave.
Article C: Judicial
…Section 6
The Conclave may rule on the actions of the Delegate or the Praesidium and nullify any which are contrary to this Concordat or statutory law. Furthermore, the Conclave may nullify any law passed by the Magisterium that is contrary to this Concordat. The Conclave is empowered to compel a legally required action by Order with an indictable penalty, as limited by law.
…
Section 11
Any Arbiter with substantial prior involvement with a matter that goes to trial must recuse themselves from said trial. If necessary, an Arbiter may be forcefully recused with the support of all other non-recused Arbiters. Recused Arbiters may not perform Arbiter duties for any matter directly related to said trial.
Section 12
The Conclave is empowered to compel an action, reversal, or suspension of action by Order with an indictable penalty for if the Order is not met. Orders can be limited in any way by statutory law. Orders can never conflict with the Concordat, and may only supersede statutory law when a compelled action or reversal/suspension of such is necessary to maintain the status quo until an on-going trial concludes (upon which the relevant Order shall no longer be enforced).
The Conclave is now responsible for administering a referendum of the citizenry to determine if the Proposal is accepted as an Amendment of the Concordat.