| Request for Judicial Review | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| LAW IN QUESTION | Article E, §2 of the Concordat of the East Pacific | ||
| LEGAL QUESTIONS OR CHALLENGES | 1/ Does the term “may” in paragraph 1 prevent automatic application and enforcement of the paragraph? | ||
| 2/ Does the term “shall” in paragraph 2 imply automatic application and enforcement of the paragraph? | |||
| 3/ Does CTEing constitute leaving the region? | |||
| 4/ Does maintenance of citizenship by returning to the region within the 12 hour window specified in the Citizenship Act have a material impact on the term “leave the Region”? | |||
| REVIEW ADVANCED BY- (indicate with "X ") | Ladonatalacton | ||
| …Delegate | () | ||
| …Magisterium | (X) | ||
| …Other Party (please indicate which) | () |
Understanding that reforming and rejoining the region within 12 hours should be sufficient to maintain citizenship under the Citizenship Act, these questions ultimately lead to the question of does Libertanny need to be renominated by the Delegate, or are they eligible for reconfirmation?
If the answers to 1, 2 and 3 are “Yes”, and the answer to 4 is “No”, then this would mean that Libertanny surrendered their position as an Arbiter when their nation CTEd and would require renomination.
Otherwise, Libertanny would need to be reconfirmed by the Magisterium once our Provost election concludes.