The Tenzennon Press is proud to have been publishing the news of greatest import to the greatest city in Wahannon for more than five hundred years. Through emperors, republics, wars, and revolutions, the Tenzennon Press has resolutely published the truth and nothing else since the Imperial Temple of Waasee first put lead type to paper in 1518.
A service of the Federal Republic of Wahannon Department of the Interior.
19 November 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Presidential Rejection of Wahanta Inter-Province Pact
ĂMAZNONâ The Supreme Court of the Federal Republic ruled Wednesday in the case of the Inter-Province Pact, a package of legislation that the eighteen provinces of the Region of Wahanta had drafted and passed in unison earlier this year, only to see it vetoed by the federal government through an unprecedented legal maneuver by President Wareg Pohassa to directly order the eighteen provincial governors to use their veto power to prevent the laws from going into effect. Proponents of the Pactâincluding all eighteen provincial First Secretaries, of various political partiesâdecried this action as contrary to the intention of the negotiators of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic, drafted as part of the final peace agreement that ended the Civil War in 2005. In the recorded notes and transcripts of the drafting process, several negotiators stated the importance of the fact that the federal President appointed the provincial Governors who held the power to veto acts of the provincial Parliaments, but did not hold that power themselves. The Supreme Court, however, has disagreed, ruling Wednesday that Governors are âfunctionaries of the Federal Governmentâ and that the Presidentâs position at the pinnacle of the federal hierarchy and constitutionally enshrined responsibility to âguarantee the continuation and functioningâ of the federal system empowered him to issue the veto order.
The Inter-Province Pact was an attempt by the eighteen provinces of Wahanta to attain some measure of regional governance for Wahanta, which unlike the three Autonomous Regions of the Federal Republic has no constitution or institutions of its own. While Amahan, BĂłhan, and the Wapagna Islands have popularly elected Presidents and legislatures by various names that are immune from federal veto, âWahantaâ is only a name used in legislation to refer to those areas of Wahannon that are not covered by an Autonomous Region, and is not a sovereign government. The federal government is directly responsible for Wahanta, and the Basic Law has established by law the system of eighteen provinces and two prefectures that administer Wahanta. The provinces all have elected Parliaments, each of which appoints a First Secretary, who is the head of government of the province. The âhead of stateâ of each province, however, is its Governor, who is appointed by the President and who holds the power of veto over the provincial Parliament. The Inter-Province Pact sought to establish mechanisms by which these Parliaments and First Secretaries could coordinate with one another and harmonize their policies, laws, and strategies, one of which was to be an âInter-Province Legislative Research Committeeâ composed of members of each Parliament elected by their peers to draft model legislation each separate body could then vote on.
The Inter-Province Pact saw broad support from every provincial Parliament, but was staunchly opposed by President Wareg Pohassa, who stated that he believed the legislation was âa direct and imminent threat to the continuation of the federal system as established by the Basic Law, and, as such, a threat to the continued peace.â On those grounds, Pohassa issued an executive order that mandated the eighteen Governors to veto the legislation for the reason that it was unconstitutional. In the lengthy order, Pohassa laid out the argument that the drafters of the Basic Law established the asymmetric system of federalism because Wahantaâs tremendous population advantageâsome 87 million people, compared to second-highest BĂłhan at just under 30 millionâwould otherwise cause it to dominate the politics of the whole country. Pohassa took particular umbrage to the Inter-Province Legislative Research Committee, stating that âcooperation of this nature between the Provinces of Wahanta would cause the true power of regulation and legislation in the overwhelming majority of the country to be held by this unaccountable committee operating outside the Basic Law and jeopardize the Federal Assemblyâs position as paramount legislature of the Federal Republic.â His executive order mandating the veto included a declaration of a state of emergency that empowered him to order the arrest of Governors who refused to follow the directive, and all eighteen complied with the order.
In their ruling, the Supreme Court determined that regardless of the notes and transcripts, âthe only truly binding authoritative constitutional law is the actual text of the Basic Lawâ and that the Basic Law contained no provision that codified the prohibition against Presidential vetoes of provincial laws. Noting that the Presidentâs order explicitly cited his authority as guarantor of the federal system and included a determination of a threat to that system, the Court ruled that the veto order was âan appropriate, though drastic, exercise of Presidential authority in service of his constitutional obligation to uphold federalism as explicitly laid out in the Basic Law.â The ruling further stated that âwhile authorities in the various Provinces will surely still have their disagreements with the Federal Government, they must seek a different method for the resolution of their grievances, namely, through either Federal legislation or an amendment to the Basic Law with the consent of the Autonomous Regions and the public.â
Members of the Federal Assembly from Wahanta have been seeking to amend the Basic Law for years to no avail. Constitutional amendments require approval of two-thirds of each chamber in the Federal Assembly, and while this has been not terribly difficult to achieve in the General Chamberâwhich is apportioned by population, meaning Wahanta holds more than half of its seats on its ownâeach proposal has been resoundingly defeated in the Senate, where the four regions of Wahannon have equal representation, and where delegations from all three Autonomous Regions have consistently opposed every attempt to expand the power of Wahanta. The Senate was hostile to the Inter-Province Pact from its inception, and President Pohassa, who is also a Senator from the Wapagna Islands and Chairman of the Senateâs Constitutional Affairs Committee, issued a statement in response to the Courtâs ruling that expressed a degree of sympathy for members of the public disappointed by the decision but making clear that the Senate would continue to oppose amendment proposals to establish regional government for Wahanta.
âI applaud the Supreme Court for making the correct decision today and protecting our federal system even if it may not be the politically popular decision. Our Constitution does not establish a legislature for Wahanta as a whole and it was improper for the eighteen provinces to attempt to circumvent the system in this way. It is the simple truth that regional government for Wahanta as a whole is not politically possible at this time. Such a thing would require the assent of the Autonomous Regions through the Senate, and it is simply not forthcoming. It was deeply, deeply irresponsible for the First Secretaries of the provinces to lie to their constituents and make false promises as they have. I feel badly for the citizens who have had their hopes raised, and are now left frustrated and heartbroken. This will make people feel resentful and angry, which increases the risk of hostility both figurative and literal. This whole situation is deeply regrettable, and will require careful, deliberate work to defuse. We as a country will have to find a way to move on,â said the President.
As could be expected, the ruling was condemned by several officials in provincial governments, most especially First Secretary WĂłxĂł Ybwahe of Tenzennon Province, who has been the unofficial leader of the inter-provincial cooperation movement. âThis ruling drastically expands Presidential power over the provinces in a way that the drafters of the constitution explicitly warned against. By ruling that the President can personally overrule any provincial law simply by slapping the words âthreat to the federal systemâ on a piece of paper and threatening to arrest the Governors, the Court has essentially ended any pretense that the citizens of the provinces have home rule and made the provinces total slaves of the federal government. This, surely, is far greater a threat to the system the drafters of the Basic Law designed when they explicitly called for Wahanta to be divided into provinces with Parliaments of their own. This is a misuse of the power afforded to the Presidency and cannot be allowed to stand. I call upon the Federal Assembly to pass a motion of no confidence and make clear to Wareg Pohassa that despite what he may think, he is no Emperor, and he should not impose his personal will over the expressed democratic intent of the citizenry of Wahannon.â Several other First Secretaries have expressed agreement with Ybwahe, and Representative DĂșhaa Ăbassa of Casrazan, who is Leader of the Opposition in the General Chamber, has pledged to introduce a motion when the Council is next in session.
If President Pohassa is to be removed from office through a motion of no confidence, it will have to be soon. A famous quirk in the Basic Law that drafters have stated was an oversight, a motion of no confidence may not be proposed in either the first year or the last year of the term of âmembers of the Federal Assembly.â The Basic Law does not otherwise use the terminology âmember of the Federal Assembly,â separately describing Representatives in the General Chamber with three year terms and Senators in the Senior Chamber, or Senate, with six year terms. The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that this means that a motion of no confidence may not be proposed in the first or last year of any member of the Federal Assembly, including Representatives. With Presidents serving six year terms coterminous with those of Senators, this means that motions of no confidence can only be proposed in either the second or the fifth year of a Presidential term, which are the second years of the two General Chamber terms that occur during a Senate term. The drafters of the Basic Law have said they intended the clause to prohibit motions of no confidence in the first and last years of the term of a President, but the Supreme Court has made clear it is the text of the Constitution that counts. With the second year of President Pohassaâs second term ending on December 31st, the window will close in just over a month.