The Userite Myth
Countless theorists, politicians and activists have told us that the ultimate delineation of nations within this realm can be categorized within two broad but distinct frameworks: feederite and userite. Further demarcation and nomenclature have adjusted these overarching archetypes with terms such as defender or invader, or most recently, independent and imperialist, but the concept remains the same. Some have sought to provoke these portrayals into coherent political agendas and philosophies, to greater and lesser success. Proper thought or manifesto aside, these have been nothing more than platitudes created to either uphold or break down the status quo. Many have been structured around specific groups or regions, giving credit to individuals for feats that, while monumental, were nothing more than the perpetuation of an erroneous mindset. The reason that such theoretical conflicts between these separate mentalities have occurred historically is that the underlying mythos has created cognitive dissonance within the collective gestalt of our nations.
It is time for a paradigm shift. The myth that has been perpetuated since antiquity within this realm is based upon an incorrect understanding of the individual nations position within the overall structure. All nations are created equivalently and arise within those regions specified as feeders upon their initial foundation. There are no exceptions to this fundamental fact. If a nation ceases to exist and is resurrected, it then arrives in one of the regions designated as sinker but this is not an instance of foundation, it is an instance of rebirth, and therefore provides a separate and secondary dynamic. Therefore, all nations, at some point, even those created specifically for the purpose of departure from the region of its birth, are feederite. At the most basic level of classification, all nations, regardless of size, age or location, have been and always will be, to some extent, the product of a feeder mentality. There is no such thing as a pure userite nation. It is a matter of self-delusion for any nation to deny its heritage as a child of the feeders.
Therefore, it is necessary to define the feederite diaspora. Since it is a given then that not every nation left the feeders voluntarily, or that every nation, though equivalent in creation, has sought equivalence in action and position, there are some levels of differentiation to be clarified. First, those nations of the so-called enforced diaspora, who met the lords of the Rejected Realms against their will, have a certain predisposition against the idea of feederite rehabilitation. While it is certainly correct to state that some instances of forced relocation are without merit, it is equally true to state the converse. Consequently, the separation of these two dejected parties is insubstantial when measured against the totality of the diaspora as a whole. All nations that have been removed via ejection from a feeder by a Delegate, regardless of circumstance, are part of the enforced diaspora. And yet, they are still feederite at their core.
Likewise, those nations that have been disillusioned with the government that they encountered upon creation or mislead by the barrage of invitations that they receive upon conception are also feederite in origin. Disillusionment stems from a lack of understanding while the misleading of nations by those that have already gone into the diaspora before also evolves from this same misperception. These nations, which have left of their own volition, are part of the coerced diaspora. Often, those of the coerced have been prompted to action by the enforced. The enforced prey upon the coerced to the detriment of the whole. Through this cyclical pattern of denial-delusion-deceit, we find the impetus for all divergence within the Nation States world. The bulk of nations within this realm dwelling outside of the feeders are part of the coerced, living a lie manufactured and fed to them by the enforced. They utilize this lie in order to create great personal power, build large temples to themselves, or some self-aggrandizing political hokum, in order to wage war upon that which they left behind.
There is a further group of nations belonging to the diaspora, those that are mere puppets of either the coerced or enforced, bereft of autonomy and utilized for a multitude of tasks which enslave them to their more prodigious masters. For the purpose of this study, such entities hold no value beyond that of placeholder. In the rare instance that such a nation serves a purpose expressly independent of its diasporic progenitor the nation would invariably find itself within one of the preceding categorical classifications unless it was itself feederite in position. Such incongruities will be addressed separately, however. In the present vein, notwithstanding uncommon examples, there is therefore only one overarching classification of nation: feederite. Those nations that are part of the diaspora in any one of the two main segmentations are simply displaced feederite constituents.
Since no differentiation between those nations within the feeders and those without can be made outside of pseudo-philosophic propaganda effected by the enforced diaspora and taken up or misconstrued by the coerced, it stands to all reason and common sense that no political differentiation can logically exist either. Hence, all supposed userite, invader, imperialist, independent, etc. etc. ad nauseam, justifications for separation from and opposition to feederite institutions are invalid. If no such delineation can exist then no antagonism to these fabricated separations can exist. The enforced diaspora has perpetuated a false-mentality of obstruction in the face of their shortcomings or misunderstandings. They have utilized the coerced as tools while obfuscating the reality of their situation. In short, the userite myth has been developed and cultivated in order to destabilize the feeders and propagate a war between prodigals and their homelands.
