[A-2024-26] The Conclave Orders Act

[Pauline_Bonaparte]

Arbiter @Zukchiva has proposed the Conclave Orders Act. This was motioned to vote on Friday, June 28, 2024 1:16 AM and seconded by Magister @EvanRikuta on Friday, June 28, 2024 1:17 AM.

INFORMATION

This proposal needs a majority of voting Magisters and a 50% quorum to pass.

IMPORTANT

A one week voting period will occur between the following period:
Thursday, July 4, 2024 10:48 AM→Thursday, July 11, 2024 10:48 AM

Choices for voting:
Vote AYE or FOR if you are in favor.
Vote NAY or AGAINST if you are against.
Vote PRESENT or ABSTAIN if you cannot make a decision.

---

SECTION I. CITATION

…1.1. This Act shall be known and cited as “The Conclave Orders Act”.

SECTION II. DEFINITIONS

…2.2. An Order shall be defined as any binding statement by the Conclave to compel any individual or institution to complete an action with an explicitly stated indictable penalty for failing to execute said action.

…2.3. A verdict shall be defined as any binding and final ruling by the Conclave on a matter of trial or legislation interpretation. Verdicts shall not be considered Orders.

…2.4. A Trial Order shall be defined as an Order to conduct, suspend, or reverse a select action in order to preserve the status quo or security of the East Pacific or rights of a Resident during a trial. Trial Orders cease to hold effect when a trial concludes.

SECTION III. ORDERS

…3.1. The Conclave may only enact these kinds of Orders:
…3.1.1. Order an individual to preform a duty required of them by law when said individual is failing to preform said duty at the proper time,
…3.1.2. Order an individual to appear before the Conclave as a witness during a trial,
…3.1.3. Order an individual who is currently on trial but has not appeared for trial to appear for said trial,
…3.1.4. Order an individual to cease behaviors that are disrupting the Conclave’s function,
…3.1.5. For the duration of a trial, Order a suspension on a government action/process if the trial concerns said action/process, for the sake of maintaining the status quo during a trial,
…3.1.6. For the duration of a trial, Order a ban or ejection on any nation of an individual on trial if said individual represents an in-game security risk to the East Pacific.

…3.2. If the Conclave believes it necessary to enact an Order that does not fit under Section 3.1 but is still required for the Conclave to preform its duties properly, it may enact such an Order following its regular processes.
…3.2.1. However, upon enactment of such an Order, the Magisterium shall hold a majority confirmation vote on said Order. Failure of the confirmation vote shall result in an immediate repeal of that Order, nullify/reverse any indictable penalty generated by said Order, and end any trial wherein the Defense is charged with an indictable penalty from said Order.
…3.2.2. The Order shall stand during the confirmation vote.
…3.2.3. The Conclave shall publicly notify the Magisterium of the enactment of such an Order within 24 hours of its enactment. Failure to give notification within that timeframe shall lead to the immediate repeal of that Order once the 24 hours expires.

…3.3. For Orders temporarily banning an individual during a trial, such a ban shall not constitute as evidence against the individual and may not factor into the Conclave’s decision making.
…3.3.1. As an exemption to the Citizenship Act, such individuals shall also be allowed to maintain Citizenship for the duration of said Order if they were a Citizen when the Order was enacted. If the Conclave does not ban the individual following a guilty verdict for the relevant trial, said individual shall be given 48 hours to become compliant with the Citizenship Act once the Order expires.

…3.4. Abuse of Orders by the Conclave, wherein the Conclave utilizes Orders in a manner that is unreasonable and/or unjust, shall be considered abuse of power and grounds for removal by the Magisterium following Concordat procedures.

SECTION IV. ADDENDUM

…4.1. The Conclave reserves the power to remove a Vizier or Magister as granted by Concordat.

…4.2. The relevant government authorities must execute a Conclave verdict even though Conclave verdicts are not considered Orders.

---

Vote:

• AYE | FOR
• NAY | AGAINST
• PRESENT | ABSTAIN

Active Magisters - 17

Index	Name	Classification
1	Altys	WA
2	American-Cascadia	WA
3	ArenaC	WA
4	Arleat	WA
5	Asendavia	WA
6	CyberiumShadow	WA
7	Dabeez	WA
8	Dremaur	WA
9	ESA	WA
10	Kingdom_of_Napels	NONWA
11	Mangegneithe	WA
12	Marrabuk	WA
13	Pauline_Bonaparte	NONWA
14	Salasatov	WA
15	Sammy23	WA
16	The Ambis	NONWA
17	Tommo	WA
	Atrocha	LOA
	EvanRikuta	LOA
	Vussul	LOA

[Pauline_Bonaparte]

Salasatov began an indefinite leave of absence on 2024-07-10T14:01:00Z.
This vote ended on 2024-07-11T10:48:00Z and has achieved quorum, with 12/16 eligible votes cast.

Index	Name	Classification	Aye	Nay	Abstain	Non Voting
1	Altys	WA			X
2	American-Cascadia	WA	X
3	ArenaC	WA	X
4	Arleat	WA	X
5	Asendavia	WA	X
6	CyberiumShadow	WA			X
7	Dabeez	WA	X
8	Dremaur	WA	X
9	ESA	WA	X
10	Kingdom_of_Napels	NONWA				X
11	Mangegneithe	WA				X
12	Marrabuk	WA			X
13	Pauline_Bonaparte	NONWA	X
14	Sammy23	WA				X
15	The Ambis	NONWA	X
16	Tommo	WA				X
=	=	=	=	=	=	=
Totals	=	=	9	0	3	4
Voting %	=	=	75.00%	0.00%	25.00%	N/A
Total %	=	=	56.25%	0.00%	18.75%	25.00%

The Conclave Orders Act has passed the Magisterium and has been sent to the delegate.