| LEGAL QUESTIONS OR CHALLENGES |
Much like its ill-fated predecessor, The Conclave Act, The Conclave Orders Act appears to establish Magisterial jurisdiction over the Conclave in a way not explicitly defined by the Concordat. Nowhere in the Concordat is the legislature given the authority to establish definitions for court “Orders”, “verdicts”, “Trial Orders”, the authority to dictate that the court “may only enact these kinds of Orders”, or the authority to demand any of the other restrictions or expectations established by the Act. These things appear to be more appropriately expressed in the SOC, over which the Magisterium has no power, or via constitutional amendment(s), if the Magisterium insists on making enforceable changes to court actions or procedure. I kindly request that the Conclave review the constitutional validity of this law. |
|
|